Essays and Articles
Thoughts on technology, marketing, strategy, and more.
IPv6 Security Myth #4: IPv6 Networks are Too Big to Scan
Here we are, all the way up to Myth #4! That makes this the 4th ...
The IETF’s *Other* Diversity Challenge: An Update
Last June I wrote an article titled "The IETF's *Other* Diversity Challenge" where I discussed ...
Chris Grundemann @ NANOG 63 talking BCOP, IETF, and more!
It feels like I just got back from ION Sri Lanka. Perhaps that's because I've ...
IPv6 Security Myth #3: No IPv6 NAT Means Less Security
We’re back again with part 3 in this 10 part series that seeks to bust ...
IPv6 Security Myth #2: IPv6 Has Security Designed In
Today we continue with part 2 of the 10 part series on IPv6 Security Myths ...
IPv6 Security Myth #1: I’m Not Running IPv6 so I Don’t Have to Worry
Now that IPv6 is being actively deployed around the world, security is more and more ...
Onwards and Upwards
Wow! What an amazing year 2014 has been. Here at Deploy360 we’ve been extremely busy! ...
Operators and the IETF: Update from IETF 91
Two weeks ago I let you all know that I would be presenting our Operators ...
Discussing Network Operator Involvement in the IETF, at IETF 91!
For the past several months, the DO team has been pouring over the survey results, continuing our discussions with operators around the world, and also discussing (and debating) how to put all of that together into a document. At the end of the day we decided to stay out of the way as much as possible, letting the results (and respondents) speak for themselves. I invite you to take a read and let us know what you think. I believe this is a great place for us to connect existing efforts and conversations, and hopefully start new ones as well. That discussion will continue in person next week. First on Sunday in the IEPG meeting, then again Wednesday morning, at a bit greater length, in the OpsAWG (Operations Area Working Group) meeting.